Dying Scientist Left Heartbreaking Letter Begging EPA To Stop Lying About Glyphosate Dangers

It has been revealed that Monsanto and the EPA have been worked together for decades, hiding the environmental impacts and deadly health risks of Monsanto’s weedkiller, Roundup.

The weedkiller is the most widely used herbicide in the world and the most used in history of chemical agriculture.

Essentially, it causes cancer…and Monsanto and the EPA have known for decades. The worst thing about this disgraceful chemical is that it’s not just the food supple it’s contaminated.

Roundup has been detected in vaccines, organic wines, baby formula, prenatal vitamins, nursing mothers breast milk and surprisingly, urine samples of people who have never handled the chemical.

Monsanto has continuously lied about the devastating health effects of their weedkiller not only on humans but the natural environment too. What’s more shocking is the fact that the EPA has cowardly keep this vital information from the public they are supposed to be protecting.

Courtesy of March Against Monsanto, (follow their awesome page on Facebook) we have access to the following letter.

The letter was written by Marion Copley, an EPA scientist who has unfortunately died of cancer and was discovered in unsealed court documents by U.S. Right To Know.

In her final months, Marion did everything she could to prevent the EPA from hiding the truth about the disgusting toxicity of Roundup.

In the letter, she pleads with Jess Rowlands, an EPA deputy division director who has been publicly been exposed as a mole for Monsanto, to do his job and protect the health of the public instead of worrying about his biotech bonus.

Copley continues in the letter, accusing Rowlands and Anna Lowit, another EPA scientist, of using scientific intimidation tactics to bully peers into editing research to favor biotech and accepting bribes from the corporation.

The letter below is heartbreaking, we think you’ll agree:


Since I left the Agency with cancer, I have studied the tumor process extensively and I have some mechanism comments which may be very valuable to CARC based on my decades of pathology experience.

I’ll pick one chemical to demonstrate my points.

Glyphosate was originally designed as a chelating agent and I strongly believe that is the identical process involved in its tumor formation, which is highly supported by the literature.

  • Chelators inhibit apoptosis, the process by which our bodies kill tumor cells
  • Chelators are endocrine disruptors, involved in tumorigenesis
  • Glyphosate induces lymphocyte proliferation
  • Glyphosate induces free radical formation
  • Chelators inhibit free radical scavenging enzymes requiring Zn, Mn or Cu for activity (i.e. SODs)
  • Chelators bind zinc, necessary for immune system function
  • Glyphosate is genotoxic, a key cancer mechanism
  • Chelators inhibit DNA repair enzymes requiring metal cofactors
  • Chelators bind Ca, Zn, Mg, etc to make foods deficient for these essential nutrients
  • Chelators bind calcium necessary for calcineurin-mediated immune response
  • Chelators often damage the kidneys or pancreas, as glyphosate does, a mechanism to tumor formation: Kidney/pancreas damage can lead to clinical chemistry changes to favor tumor growth
  • Glyphosate kills bacteria in the gut and the gastrointestinal system is 80% of the immune system
  • Chelators suppress the immune system making the body susceptible to tumors

Previously, CARC concluded that glyphosate was a “possible human carcinogen”. The kidney pathology in the animal studies would lead to tumors with other mechanisms listed above. Any one of these mechanisms alone listed can cause tumors, but glyphosate causes all of them simultaneously.

It is essentially certain that glyphosate causes cancer. With all of the evidence listed above, the CARC category should be changed to “probable human carcinogen”. Blood cells arc most exposed to chelators, if any study shows proliferation of lymphocytes, then that is confirmatory that glyphosate is a carcinogen.

Jess, you and I have argued many times on CARC. You often argued about topics outside of your knowledge, which is unethical. Your trivial MS degree from 1971 Nebraska is far outdated, thus CARC science is 10 years behind the literature in mechanisms.

For once in your life, listen to me and don’t play your political conniving games with the science to favor the registrants. For once do the right thing and don’t make decisions based on how it affects your bonus. You and Anna Lowit intimidated staff on CARC and changed MI ARC and IIASPOC final reports to favor industry

Chelators clearly disrupt calcium signaling, a key signaling pathway in all cellos and mediates tumor progression. Greg Ackerman is supposed to be our expert on mechanisms, but he never mentioned any of these concepts at CARC and when I tried to discuss it with him he put me off. Is Greg playing your political games as well, incompetent or does he have some conflict of interest of some kind?

Your Nebraska colleague took industry funding, he clearly has a conflict of interest. Just promise me not to ever let Anna on the CARC committee, her decisions don’t make rational sense. If anyone in OPP is taking bribes, it is her.

I have cancer and I don’t want these serious issues in MED to go unaddressed before I go to my grave. I have done my duty.

Marion Copley March 4, 2013

It couldn’t be much sadder, could it?

Alas, given the current administration’s attitude toward the EPA – namely, tear it down, rather than give it the power to actually do something – it doesn’t seem like this is likely to change anytime soon…


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Show Buttons
Hide Buttons